The political economy of California agriculture
Trump’s immigration
crackdown is supposed to help U.S.
citizens. For California farmers, it’s worsening a desperate labor shortage.
By Natalie Kitroeff and Geoffrey Mohan for the Los Angeles
Times, March 17, 2017
[….] The flow of labor began drying up when President Obama
tightened the border. Now President Trump is promising to deport more people,
raid more companies and build a wall on the southern border. That has made
California farms a proving ground for the Trump team’s theory that by cutting
off the flow of immigrants they will free up more jobs for American-born
workers and push up their wages. So far, the results aren’t encouraging for
farmers or domestic workers.
Farmers are being forced to make difficult choices about
whether to abandon some of the state’s hallmark fruits and vegetables, move
operations abroad, import workers under a special visa or replace them
altogether with machines. Growers who can afford it have already begun raising
worker pay well beyond minimum wage. Wages for crop production in California
increased by 13% from 2010 to 2015, twice as fast as average pay in the state,
according to a Los Angeles Times analysis
of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Today, farmworkers in the state earn about $30,000 a year if
they work full time — about half the overall average pay in California. Most
work fewer hours. Some farmers are even giving laborers benefits normally
reserved for white-collar professionals, like 401(k) plans, health insurance,
subsidized housing and profit-sharing bonuses. Full-timers at Silverado
Farming, for example, get most of those sweeteners, plus 10 paid vacation days,
eight paid holidays, and can earn their hourly rate to take English classes.
But the raises and new perks have not tempted native-born
Americans to leave their day jobs for the fields. Nine in 10 agriculture workers
in California are still foreign born, and more than half are undocumented,
according to a federal survey. [….]
‘The law of supply and demand doesn’t stop being true just
because you’re talking about people,’ says George Borjas, a Harvard economist
and prominent foe of unfettered immigration. ‘[Farmers] have had an almost
endless supply of low-skill workers for a long time, and now they are finding
it difficult to transition to a situation where they don’t.’
Borjas believes the ones who reap the rewards of immigration
are employers — not just farmers, but restaurant owners and well-to-do
homeowners who hire landscapers and housekeepers. The people who suffer most
are American workers, who contend with more competition for jobs and lower pay.
But Silverado, the farm labor contracting company in Napa,
has never had a white, American-born person take an entry-level gig, even after
the company increased hourly wages to $4 above the minimum. And Silverado is
far from unique.
U.S. workers filled just 2% of a sample of farm labor
vacancies advertised in 1996, according to a report published by the Labor
Department’s office of inspector general. ‘I don’t think anybody would dispute
that that’s roughly the way it is now’ as well, says Philip Martin, an
economist at UC Davis and one of the country’s leading experts on agriculture.
[….]
The full article, with wonderful photographs, is here.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home